Most potential clients appear in my office in considerable anticipation due to a court case coming up. The bottom line is that they are in a pressing legal need, but they don’t have money to afford an attorney. The wife or husband has hired an attorney and has decided to bring them to court regarding a family law problem. Whether the wife now wishes to have full custody of the children or the husband wants to change the spousal support or child support he is currently paying. Such situations understandably put many people in a panicked state because they are faced with the pressing question of whether to seek legal representation or attempt to go alone at it. You may find more details about this at Kovarik Law-Child Custody Lawyer.
As many self-represented individuals are acutely aware, the legal system is not a friendly place for self-represented individuals particularly in Santa Clara County. From preparing the paperwork properly to following correct legal procedure, there are many technical challenges. If there are even the smallest errors, a court paper may be rejected or a worse case may be rejected because of what seem to be small errors.
First location, I tell clients to go is their local library or book store. There is a brand of Nolo press books that can provide the lay people with excellent information on how to conduct their own divorce. It’s a perfect launch pad to continue your divorce yourself. The next move is to head to the nearest law library, such as the law library in the Santa Clara County, to continue to look through the real legal literature. Because an person who is self-represented serves as his or her own counsel, they are kept to certain exacting standards. The concern with Nolo Press books is that they are not county unique. They ‘re made state-specific only. Specific counties have different administrative laws that must be enforced.
Most prospective clients tell me they’ve attempted self-representation because it’s always so time-consuming because impossible to achieve. When the scenario arises, I still advise prospective clients that they have other choices. They have the choice of restricted access family law coverage in California Family Courts, with what is often considered unbundled programs. What that implies is that an attorney may decide to serve a client for a small portion of his case. If the section should table a petition, write a declaration, clarify court procedures, evaluate their argument, and provide legal strategies and advise. For a client only a restricted scope solicitor can appear in trial. This versatility allows it easier for the customer to stop charging a regular retainer and is usually $2,000-$ 5,000 for complete coverage of the solicitor. Essentially the customer will pay when you ride to get help if they can manage it. The downside of this agreement is that the counsel will serve them only for the sum of research settled upon. After conclusion of the study the individual is still self-represented and eventually always accountable for their own situation. That method fits with people with a clear knowledge of their situation, including those who are unwilling to pay a complete retainer of the counsel.
To those needing guidance on low cost San Jose and the Santa Clara County Family Practice, there are many free and moderate means alternatives. I suggest that no-money clients talk with Silicon Valley ‘s Pro Bono Team, they often serve clients for free. The coverage is mainly linked to domestic abuse, although they do include certain examples in family law. They do have immense competition and sadly that helps them to be very selective in the situations they are willing to pursue.